Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
63-летняя Деми Мур вышла в свет с неожиданной стрижкой17:54，更多细节参见同城约会
第七十五条 有下列行为之一的，处警告或者五百元以下罚款；情节较重的，处五日以上十日以下拘留，并处五百元以上一千元以下罚款：。业内人士推荐Line官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
此外，對於何衛東、苗華，官方定性是「嚴重辜負黨中央、中央軍委的信任」，對於張又俠和劉振立，則在這句話後多了兩個字，「嚴重辜負黨中央、中央軍委的信任重託」。